Ian E. Muller
So I saw Beowulf tonight with Will. It met my expectations. The interesting part is though that I saw it in the “new” Digital 3d. Now, I have never seen a 3d movie before, but apparently the most common complaint about them is that one gets a headache, which the new 3d-ness is supposed to avoid. My only complain is that when text was on the screen, or something was moving very fast, my eyes unfocused. However this might have been due to the fact that we were sitting closer than most people do. Over all though I’d say it definitely made the movie better, watching it in 3d. Btw, if you don’t want your view of the movie to be biased before seeing it, don’t read this… also - spoilers.
The movie itself… was good. I haven’t read Beowulf in a long time, and I just started rereading it, but I like the way they portrayed both Beowulf and Hrothgar. There are a LOT of translations of Beowulf, and they all give a different spin on the characters. The movie portrayed them as I personally believe they should be. Men. Drunken bastards, who are just as much monsters as the demons they slay, in their own way. None of this “epic-her- who-can-do-no-wrong” crap. It was well done. Grendel was portrayed very well also, less evil, more… “animal.” I guess that would be the best way to describe it. He doesn’t kill people because he’s evil, he kills them because they are causing him pain (although possibly unknowingly). As far as the post-Grendel stuff (aka the important parts) I can’t remember the original all that well, so I’m going to hold off on comments until after I’ve re-read it (which I’m going to start doing on the way to work tomorrow).
The CG was excellent, I couldn’t have asked for it to be better. It was… “life” like, except for one or two scenes, where it was obviously fake (and I don’t mean “hey it’s a monster fake” I mean “hey, that looks computer generated” fake”). They did an excellent job with it. It was also definitely “filmed” with the 3d in mind. I’m not sure if the original intention was for it to be 3d or not, but some of the imagery would definitely be lost without it. They also captured the imagery I think of when thinking about Beowulf well, the landscape, Grendel and his mothers caverns, etc. It all fit well into my mental image. It’s also far less graphic than I was expecting. Sure theres blood, sure people are torn asunder, but it wasn’t gruesome. Definitely something you could take kids to I think. If you allow them to attend mature films (which you should, in my opinion). There was also some interesting religion symbolism, particularly in regards to Christianity (interpret as you will, I appreciated it, and got a good laugh out of one particular scene).
The voice-acting was excellent, the names I knew did the jobs I expected them too (actually, I was most impressed with Anthony Hopkins, and John Malkovich disappointed me slightly, he did not portray drunk well). Also, the actors I didn’t recognize did excellent jobs, particularly Robin Wright Penn and Charlotte Salt . Also, I didn’t know this before hand, but Neil Gaiman wrote the screenplay, which is just kind of cool. Anyway, I’m rambling. Go see it if you were interested, and if you weren’t… reconsider. It was an excellent movie. Also, if you have the choice, I would recommend seeing the 3d version, it definitely improved the experience.
Oh yeah, and there was a trailer for Sweeney Todd which makes me want to see it even more than I did before. It’s going to be bloody awesome. And it’s a musical… which Johnny Depp, how can you go wrong.
~Ian